Friday, November 30, 2012

The 10 Most Stolen Vehicles

The National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB) recently released its annual list of the most frequently stolen cars in the U.S., and the 1994 Honda Accord topped the list for the fourth year in a row.

Though late-model sports and luxury cars tend to be swiped intact and sold with swapped identification numbers and laundered titles or sent to other countries, more-common models (like the Honda Accord, Honda Civic, and Toyota Camry – especially older examples that lack newer key-code anti-theft technology) are usually driven or towed away and immediately dismantled at so-called “chop shops.” While the recoverable value of any of these dated models tends to be comparatively minimal, they’re worth far more as an amalgam of salvaged used parts sold by unscrupulous vendors.

The NICB reviewed vehicle theft data submitted by law enforcement to the National Crime Information Center during 2011 to produce the following list of the 10 most-stolen vehicles during 2011:
  1. 1994 Honda Accord midsize
  2. 1998 Honda Civic compact
  3. 2006 Ford F-150 pickup
  4. 1991 Toyota Camry midsize
  5. 2000 Dodge Caravan minvian
  6. 1994 Acura Integra compact
  7. 1999 Chevrolet Silverado pickup
  8. 2004 Dodge Ram pickup
  9. 2002 Ford Explorer SUV
  10. 1994 Nissan Sentra compact


Main Line Insurance, located in Paoli, Pennsylvania, serves businesses and individuals in PA, DE, NJ, MD, VA, and FL. 
Our staff will help you analyze your insurance coverage issues to develop insurance policies for your specific requirements.

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Liquor Liability Insurance

Liquor Liability is an essential type of restaurant insurance for establishments that sell alcoholic beverages. Selling alcoholic beverages carries with it a risk of irresponsible behavior by intoxicated patrons. Property damage, personal injury, or service of alcohol to underage customers could result in lawsuits being brought against a restaurant, club, or bar who serves alcohol.

In the eyes of liquor liability and restaurant insurance providers, some business types and business practices are more risky than others. Factors such as the average age of the patrons, type of entertainment provided, drink promotions, and age verification procedures can have a great effect on the level of liquor liability the business requires.

Source: http://theliquorlicenseadvisor.com/blog/?cat=9

Main Line Insurance, located in Paoli, Pennsylvania, has over 35 years of experience providing restaurant insurance to food and drink establishments ranging from the corner deli to the large fine dining five star eatery.

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

What Can You Do If Your Sandy Insurance Claim Is Denied?


November 13, 2012
By Michael L. Diamond, Asbury Park Press, N.J.
The townhouse at 2 Vista Shores Drive in Union Beach lies in a crumpled heap with a lifetime of Susanne Bannon's belongings -- photos from a childhood in Ireland, Waterford crystal from her wedding, the bed she slept in last month -- now in one pile.
What is less clear is what caused the structure overlooking the Raritan Bay to topple over the night superstorm Sandy struck. Was it the wind, or was it the flood?
It's a distinction that for many homeowners at the Shore is at the heart of whether they can recoup their losses. Most every household has a homeowner's policy that covers damage by wind, rain and fire. Fewer have policies that cover flood damage.
It has sent Bannon, at least, scrambling to figure out her options after her homeowner's insurance claim was denied. And it has set the stage for a fight between homeowners and insurance companies that, if Hurricane Katrina is a sign, could wind up in court for many years.
"Most of the time (with Katrina), most of the problems were which (natural disaster) came first," said Mark Mese, an attorney who specializes in insurance for Kean Miller, a law firm in Baton Rouge, La. "It looks like there's going to be the same problem with Sandy."
Bannon was told by her insurance company, Allstate, that her home was brought down by the flood. It could cost her more than $100,000 -- the difference between what Allstate pays for her contents and what her flood policy pays through the federal National Flood Insurance Program.
Bannon, now in her late 60s, moved to Union Beach in 1999, downsizing from her home in Hazlet a few years after her husband died and her two children went out on their own.
She found an end unit in a townhouse complex, which, on clear days, came with a picturesque view of the bay and Manhattan.
With Sandy approaching, Bannon heeded evacuation orders and stayed at the Keyport home of her daughter, Maureen. The next day, she returned to Union Beach. By habit, she walked into the end unit. It belonged to someone else. Her home was nothing more than debris.
"It was devastation in Union Beach," Bannon said, standing outside what was left of her home. "I walked by this and said, 'Thank God this is a pile of rubble.' I walked in this door and said, 'This doesn't look like my unit.' "
Are you selling the #1 Critical Illness Product?
Maureen Bannon said Allstate had claims adjusters on the scene quickly, and they were nothing but sympathetic, leading the Bannons to believe that Susanne's homeowner's policy would cover the damage. But four days later they got a call; Allstate said the damage was caused by flood and was closing the claim.
It left Susanne Bannon to turn to her flood policy, where she quickly found the problem. Her homeowner's policy reimburses her up to $146,000 for contents. Her flood insurance policy reimburses her up to $12,800 for the same, she said.
Tracy Owens, a spokesman for Allstate, said he couldn't discuss individual homeowners' policies. But he said tidal waters can cause floods, which would not be covered by homeowners' policies.
The issue of what caused the damage first -- wind, fire or flood -- is one that homeowners and insurers fight over after virtually every hurricane. And Sandy with its 80 mph sustained winds and huge tidal surges offers more complications than normal, said Leslie Knox, a public insurance adjuster with Andrew K. Knox and Co. in Toms River.
Some damaged properties are easier to assess than others. Property insurers can point to a discolored line on the wall as evidence of where flood waters reached and conclude they won't pay for damage, say, on the first floor, Knox said.
If the building isn't standing?
"It makes it pretty hard to develop an argument when the building has been demolished," Knox said.
Homeowners who find themselves in disputes have some options:
  • They can hire a public insurance adjuster who can assist the property owner in preparation, presentation and adjustment of Sandy-related losses. While insurance claims adjusters work on behalf of the insurance company, public insurance adjusters work on behalf of consumers. The two sides may be able to meet and iron out differences.
  • Policyholders who don't agree on the settlement amount can avoid litigation and demand an appraisal. Both sides hire appraisers. They meet to discuss differences. And if they can't agree, it is sent to an umpire to decide.
  • New Jersey policyholders whose claims are denied can appeal to their insurer's ombudsman who would review the decision.
  • Policyholders can hire an attorney and take the case to court -- a move that wasn't uncommon after Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast.
The Bannons have hired an attorney and now are looking for clues to piece together an expensive question: What caused 2 Vista Shores Drive to collapse?
Learn more about our wide range of solutions
All around the borough are crumpled homes gutted by floods. But here, every other townhouse is standing. The attic is on the bottom of the pile. And all of the contents -- the oven, the exercise ball, the kitchen table -- aren't washed away, but lie in one neat heap.
At stake is whether Susanne Bannon rebuilds here, or begins to search for a new place to live.
"This is the only logical spot for her to be happy, content," Maureen Bannon said. "It fits her."

Source

Vehicle History May Become Another Insurance Rating Factor

November 16, 2012
Calumet City, Illinois (PRWEB) November 16, 2012
Auto liability insurance rates are generally expressed as a function of applicant's credit score, ZIP code, age, gender, marital status, driving history, besides certain surcharges and discounts. Physical damage car insurance rates are based, generally speaking, on the value of the insured vehicle. While most standard carriers have been using the CLUE reports in their underwriting, a couple of new patents have been filed by CARFAX to incorporate the vehicle history data in the auto insurance rating models.
Auto insurers have been using the C.L.U.E. reports and VIN reports for a while. CLUE auto reports offer a seven year history of automobile insurance losses associated with a person. The paid service is offered by LexisNexis. CLUE reports include the following data: date of auto loss, loss type, and amount paid along with general information such as policy number, claim number and name of insurer.
The U.S. Department of Justice in partnership with the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA) run a governmental body called the National Motor Vehicle Title Information System (NMVITS) to identify vehicle history pertaining damaged vehicles in order to prevent fraud. There are few other paid services in the private sector that compete with CARFAX in providing vehicle history data reports from the NMVITS. These include Auto Data Direct, Check That VIN, CVR, Experian, InstaVIN, and VIN Smart. Information included in the NMVITS includes current and previous state of title data, title issue date, latest odometer data, theft history data (if any), any brand assigned to a vehicle and date applied, as well as salvage history, including designations as a "total loss" (if any).
Ed Snenneh of Insurance Navy, a leading provider of auto insurance in Chicago said that the "new CARFAX patents are aiming at incorporating the vehicle history data, using quantitative models (scores), in the pricing models of auto insurance. Currently some carriers use the vehicle history information for reasons other than pricing. It is unsure how insurers will use the information. For example, if the data reveals lower value for a particular vehicle, will the insurer charge less physical damage premium to insure that particular vehicle because the amount at risk is lower?"
"The biggest issue we see is the cost vs benefit resulting from using the new models. Insurers will incur additional costs for ordering these reports. Will the increase in revenues from using these additional pricing factors justify the cost of obtaining the data for each vehicle to be insured? This question is yet to be answered by the insurers," Mr. Snenneh added.

Source

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Health insurers begin to provide user-friendly plan guides


Under President Barack Obama's healthcare reform law, employers and insurers must provide a summary of benefits and coverage in a clearly worded, standardized format that allows the private insurance market's 163 million beneficiaries to make side-by-side comparisons of plan offerings.
Consumers are also required to have access to a standardized glossary of insurance and medical terms. The rule takes effect just as insurers and employers prepare for annual enrollment periods, when employees select their coverage for 2013.
The benefit guides will also factor into the creation of new state-based health insurance markets due to begin offering subsidized, private coverage to moderate-income consumers in January 2014.
The Department of Health and Human Services released an eight-page sample benefits form to demonstrate how the actual summaries will outline everything from deductibles and out-of-pocket expenses to referrals and network providers.
The guides are also supposed to show what a plan covers for two common medical situations -- new births and adult diabetes.
U.S. officials compared the summaries to the Nutrition Facts label required for packaged food sold in the United States.
The rule has been criticized by the insurance industry as a new administrative burden that will increase the cost of healthcare coverage. 

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Insurance gap needs to be filled


Many people who could use additional auto insurance protection may not find that out until it's too late. They would have a better chance of not facing that gap if the governor approves legislation encouraging, although not requiring, drivers to choose to buy greater liability insurance.
The bill, sponsored by the chairmen of the insurance committees, Sen. James L. Seward, R-Oneonta, and Assemblyman Joseph Morelle, D-Rochester, and passed overwhelmingly in both houses is expected to reach Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo's desk soon.
It goes to the heart of what consumers often think they're getting and the reality that can hit them.
New York motorists tend to increase their liability insurance to protect other motorists from their negligence beyond the legal limit of $25,000 per individual and $50,000 per accident. And that's good because according to the Insurance Research Council, about 5 percent of cars in New York were uninsured in 2009. That places New York at the very lowest end of states by percentage of uninsured motorists, but that's still a big number.
So what about those people who have already opted to increase their liability insurance?
What they don't know - and may find out painfully after a serious accident - is that their increase in liability insurance coverage was not matched by an increase in their supplementary uninsured/underinsured motorist (SUM) insurance. This is the insurance that provides coverage in the event that they are the victims of an accident with an uninsured or underinsured driver.
It isn't until the unpaid bills start to show up that many discover they did not, in fact, have the coverage they expected.
Consumer advocates point to the case of Staten Island residents Victor and Wilma Rao, who were hit by an uninsured ex-convict who was driving drunk. The local business owners had purchased additional liability insurance but did not have additional SUM coverage.
Both were seriously injured. Because the other driver had no insurance, the couple had to take care of hospital and rehabilitation bills that piled up above the $25,000 minimum uninsured/underinsured coverage they had.
New York's legislation would establish the default setting for SUM coverage at the amount chosen by the consumer for liability. It is aimed only at consumers choosing liability coverage above the statutory minimums, and should cost less than $100 per year for most policyholders.
Again, this is not a requirement. The supplemental insurance, for those who can afford it, is a prudent investment. This law will ensure that they know about it.

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

The importance of long-term insurance

Long-term disability insurance and long-term care insurance are difficult issues to talk about.

For starters, there are many situations where these types of insurance are never needed at all. If someone passes away very suddenly, the money spent on these insurances goes for naught.


In some situations, the premiums might simply be beyond what they can actually afford. These types of insurance are not free, after all.
In my view, the benefits of long-term disability and long-term care insurance are worth the cost, but only if you’re in a position to afford it without putting your finances into crisis mode.
So, what are these policies?
Long-term disability insurance is a type of insurance that provides you with some portion of your salary in the event that you’re no longer able to work because of your job. Some employers offer this coverage directly, but in many cases, you have to obtain it yourself.
Long-term care insurance is a type of insurance that pays for some or all of the costs of your long-term care if you find yourself in a situation where you need extensive care for your health. Often, this occurs near the end of one’s life, when medical issues begin to mount.
In both cases, you need to fully understand what is being insured when you get the policy. While some policies are very strong, others are full of loopholes which minimize what the insurance company would have to pay.

So, when do you need these policies?
If you’re a professional who earns an income that your family simply could not live without, you should strongly think about long-term disability insurance. There are many situations where your ability to do your job could be limited severely without taking your life (blindness, severe injury, brain trauma, countless diseases). If you’re making a strong income and your family relies on that, you should think about this type of insurance.
On the other hand, long-term care insurance appeals more to retirees and people approaching that age. The goal with long-term care insurance is to make sure that you’re covered as well as possible should you need long-term care during your final years. If you have a spouse, a large part of the reason for obtaining the insurance is to protect your partner.
In either case, get the insurance only if it doesn’t break the bank for you. Most of the time, the cost is on the order of a hundred dollars (or two) per month, depending on your specific situation. Get it if you can afford it, because the peace of mind it can give you is worth it.